PAPURT v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK et al
| ROCHELLE A. PAPURT |
| ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, TODD L. BUSKIRK, MICHAEL BATEMAN, JOSEPH KOSPIAH, ARNOLD MATOS, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and EASTON EMERGENCY SQUAD |
| 5:2015cv02523 |
| May 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Northampton |
| JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT PRIMECARE MEDICAL SERVICES MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND ALL RESPONSES AND REPLIES THERETO, THE MOTION (DOC. 77 ) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE TWO REMAINING COUN TS IN THIS ACTION (COUNTS VII AND XXI) ARE REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/14/17. 2/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT PRIMECARE MEDICAL SERVICE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. COUNT VIII OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/27/2016. 1/28/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) Modified on 1/28/2016 (tjd).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
