STOUFFER v. THE CITY OF READING et al
Plaintiff: HARRY STOUFFER
Defendant: THE CITY OF READING, VAUGHN SPENCER, BRIAN NICARRY, WILLIAM HEIM, O'BRIEN WRECKING CO., INC. and JOHN DOES
Case Number: 5:2015cv03523
Filed: June 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Berks
Presiding Judge: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 57 ) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ALL COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS WILLIAM HEIM, BRIAN NICARRY VAUGHN SPENCER, THE CITY OF READING AND THE JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS AND AG AINST THE PLAINTIFF. PLAINTIFFS NEGLIGENCE CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT OBRIEN WRECKING CO., INC. (COUNT XIV) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT DINOSAUR DEMOLITION, LLCS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 56 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC. 71 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. 54 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/13/17. 12/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED. (mas, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STOUFFER v. THE CITY OF READING et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HARRY STOUFFER
Represented By: KATHLEEN D. DAUTRICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE CITY OF READING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VAUGHN SPENCER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN NICARRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM HEIM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: O'BRIEN WRECKING CO., INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?