CHRISTIAN v. COLVIN et al
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY A. CHRISTIAN
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Case Number: 5:2015cv03762
Filed: July 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2017 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED AND THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY IS AFFIRMED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF SHIRLEY A. CHRISTIAN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/25/17. 1/25/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHRISTIAN v. COLVIN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY A. CHRISTIAN
Represented By: BETH ARNOLD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?