HINES EL v. MOONEY et al
| CRAIG HINES EL |
| MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 5:2015cv04103 |
| July 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Berks |
| LYNNE A. SITARSKI |
| JOSEPH F. LEESON |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER THAT HINES ELS OBJECTIONS, ECF NO. 11 , TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ECF NO. 6 , IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, ECF NO. 1 , IS DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY; THIS CASE IS CLOSED; AND THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 11/16/17. 11/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER THAT: 1. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDAION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 2 THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2254 IS SUMMARILY DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED. 3. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 12/3/2015. 12/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER.(lbs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
