KORTYNA v. LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Plaintiff: ANDREW KORTYNA
Defendant: LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Case Number: 5:2015cv04625
Filed: August 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Northampton
Presiding Judge: JOSEPH F. LEESON
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #22) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/27/17. 3/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KORTYNA v. LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANDREW KORTYNA
Represented By: BRIAN FARRELL
Represented By: SIDNEY L. GOLD
Represented By: WILLIAM RIESER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Represented By: BRITTANY MCCABE
Represented By: JOSHUA W.B. RICHARDS
Represented By: JOHN F. STOVIAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?