FISHER v. KING et al
| JOHN R. FISHER |
| MEGAN L. KING and ERIC ZIMMERMAN |
| 5:2015cv06134 |
| November 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lancaster |
| JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER THAT THE 43 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT, MEGAN L. KING, ESQ. IS GRANTED; THE 44 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT, ERIC ZIMMERMAN, IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/22/17. 9/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT, MEGAN L. KING, ESQ. (DOCKET NO. 10 ), IS DENIED; THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT, ERIC ZIMMERMAN (DOCKET NO. 8 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT, ERIC ZIM MERMAN, IS GRANTED ONLY AS TO THE OFFICIAL CAPACITY CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT ZIMMERMAN, AND IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS; AND IF PLAINTIFF WISHES TO PURSUE AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT ZIMMERMAN, HE SHALL FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER THAT PROPERLY PLEADS SUCH A CLAIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 7/19/16. 7/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
