RICHARDSON et al v. VERDE ENERGY USA, INC.
BRIAN RICHARDSON, MICHELLE HUNT and JOHN WHITE |
VERDE ENERGY USA, INC. |
5:2015cv06325 |
November 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Berks |
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS BASED ON DEFENDANT'S ALLEGED USE OF AN "AUTOMATIC TELEPHONE DIALING SYSTEM." PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS BASED ON DEFENDANT'S ALLEGED USE OF AN "AUTOMATI C TELEPHONE DIALING SYSTEM." WILL THEREFORE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATION IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE FILING OF CERTAIN BRIEFS IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/14/18. 12/18/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Filing 26 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #17) IS DENIED IN PART, & GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFFS' CLAIM FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES IS DISMISSED. THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER ASPECTS.SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 12/19/16. 12/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR A STAY OF THIS ACTION (DOC. #8) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/24/16. 8/25/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.