TAGGART et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
KENNETH J. TAGGART |
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., MERSCORP, INC., FEDERAL HOM LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., EUGENE JASKIEWICZ, LISA ROACH and DOES |
MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. |
5:2016cv00063 |
January 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Montgomery |
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/28/2017. 7/28/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Filing 50 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 5/30/2017. 5/30/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Filing 26 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED. COUNTS I, II, III, AND VI OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNTS IV AND V OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF HAS 20 DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/30/2016. 9/30/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.