RIVERA v. SOMMERS et al
| AMILICAR RIVAS RIVERA |
| JACK SOMMERS, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER |
| 5:2016cv00456 |
| January 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lancaster |
| MARK A. KEARNEY |
| HENRY S. PERKIN |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
AMENDED MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 2/4/20. 2/5/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDERED THE PETITIONER'S LETTER REQUEST 53 TO REINSTATE HIS APPEAL RIGHTS IS DENIED AS WE LACK A BASIS TO REOPEN THE APPEAL TIME UNDER FED. R. APP. P.4(A)(6). SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/29/20. 1/30/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER THAT WE OVERRRULE MR. RIVERA'S OBJECTIONS AND APPROVE AND ADOPT JUDGE PERKIN'S EXTENSIVE WELL-REASONED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; WE DENY AND DISMISS MR RIVER'A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AS MR. RIVERA HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DEBATE THE CORRECTNESS OF THE PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF THIS RULING NOR HAS HE MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/30/17. 10/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
