BOYADJIAN v. COLVIN
Plaintiff: ANTRANIK BEDROS BOYADJIAN
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Case Number: 5:2016cv01876
Filed: April 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Lehigh
Presiding Judge: BERLE M. SCHILLER
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 1/24/2017. 1/24/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOYADJIAN v. COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTRANIK BEDROS BOYADJIAN
Represented By: THOMAS D. SUTTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?