NEY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al

NEY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al

Plaintiff:	WILLIAM NEY
Defendant:	OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and ASBESTOS CORP. LTD.
Case Number:	5:2016cv02408
Filed:	May 17, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Nature of Suit:	Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 6, 2016	Filing 41 ORDER THAT MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. 25) IS DENIED. THE ORDER OF THE HONORABLE ARNOLD L. NEW OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR PHILA. COUNTY, DATED 4/5/2016, GRANTING PLFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL FILED IN THE STATE COURT IS VACATED. ACL SHALL PRODUCE TO PLFF WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE SALE & SUPPLY OF ASBESTOS FIBERS BY ACL FOR THE YEARS 1945 TO 1953 TO THE COMPANIES AS OUTLINED HEREIN, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 12/6/16. 12/7/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
August 11, 2016	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY (DOC. NO. 13 ), IS GRANTED AND THE REPLY ATTACHED TO THE MOTION IS DEEMED FILED AS OF 7/8/2016. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 9 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/11/2016. 8/12/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 6, 2016

Filing 41 ORDER THAT MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. 25) IS DENIED. THE ORDER OF THE HONORABLE ARNOLD L. NEW OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR PHILA. COUNTY, DATED 4/5/2016, GRANTING PLFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL FILED IN THE STATE COURT IS VACATED. ACL SHALL PRODUCE TO PLFF WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE SALE & SUPPLY OF ASBESTOS FIBERS BY ACL FOR THE YEARS 1945 TO 1953 TO THE COMPANIES AS OUTLINED HEREIN, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 12/6/16. 12/7/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

August 11, 2016

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY (DOC. NO. 13 ), IS GRANTED AND THE REPLY ATTACHED TO THE MOTION IS DEEMED FILED AS OF 7/8/2016. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 9 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/11/2016. 8/12/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM NEY
Represented By:	JACQUELINE P GRUHLER
Represented By:	WILLIAM L. KUZMIN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.
Represented By:	BARBARA K. GOTTHELF
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ASBESTOS CORP. LTD.
Represented By:	JANET E. GOLUP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?