STICKILY v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
| WALT STICKILY |
| COUNTY OF LANCASTER, DENNIS MOLYNEAUX, PAUL SMEAL, JOHN DOES 1-100, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and JOHN DOES A-Z |
| 5:2016cv06252 |
| November 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS [DOCS. 41 AND 43] ARE GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: PURSUANT TO ECF 48-1, P. 5 N.1, COUNT ONE IS DISMISSED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS, DENNIS MOLYNEAUX, PAUL SMEAL, JOHN DOES 1-100 AND A-Z IN COUNTS TWO THROUGH FO UR OF THE COMPLAINT ARE ALSO DISMISSED. THE MOTIONS ARE GRANTED AS TO COUNT TWO OF THE COMPLAINT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. AND COUNTY OF LANCASTER AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF ON COUNT TWO OF THE COMPLAI NT. COUNTS THREE AND FOUR OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF BRINGING THESE CLAIMS IN THE APPROPRIATE STATE COURT. SINCE THIS ACTION WAS TIMELY FILED AND HAS BEEN PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT, THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED FOR FILING PURPOSES IN STATE COURT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/28/20. 2/28/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS [DOCS. 41 AND 43] ARE GRANTED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL (DOC. 48-1, P. 5, N.1) DEFENDANTS DENNIS MOLYNEAUX, PAUL SMEAL AND JOHN DOES 1-100 AND JOHN DOES A-Z ARE DISMISSED FR OM THIS ACTION. COUNT ONE OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTIONS ARE GRANTED AS TO COUNT TWO OF THE COMPLAINT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. AND COUNTY OF LANCASTER. AND AGAINST THE PLAI NTIFF ON COUNT TWO OF THE COMPLAINT. COUNTS THREE AND FOUR OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF BRINGING THESE CLAIMS IN THE APPROPRIATE STATE COURT. SINCE THIS ACTION WAS TIMELY FILED AND HAS BEEN PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT, THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED FOR FILING PURPOSES IN STATE COURT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/15/19. 2/15/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
