DAVIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON
ERIC MONROE DAVIS |
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON |
5:2017cv00021 |
January 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lehigh |
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER OF 9/26/2018 THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 28) IS GRANTED. THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL. 9/26/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) Modified on 9/26/2018 (dt, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DAVIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ERIC MONROE DAVIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.