ADAMS v. ZIMMER US, INC. et al
| MARILYN ADAMS |
| ZIMMER US, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER, INC. and ZIMMER SURGICAL, INC. |
| 5:2017cv00621 |
| February 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lehigh |
| EDWARD G. SMITH |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER OF 8/14/2018 THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT ZIMMER US, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER INC., AND ZIMMER SURGICAL, INC. (DOC. 75) IS GRANTED. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS, ZIMMER US, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMME R, INC., AND ZIMMER SURGICAL, INC., AND AGAINST THE PLFF, ON ALL COUNTS OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 34), THE MOTION FOR BIFURCATION AND SEPARATE JURIES (DOC. NO. 85), THE MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. ALBERT BURSTEIN (DOC. NO. 92) THE SECOND MTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 93), THE MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. GEORGE KANTOR (DOC. NO. 94), THE MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. STEPHEN LI (DOC. NO. 95), AND THE MOTION TO STRIKE THE SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 96) ARE DENIED AS MOOT; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: EDWARD G. SMITH. 8/14/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
