HAMMOND v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
KHALIL K. HAMMOND |
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JARRAD P. BERKIHISER and LANCASTER CITY |
5:2017cv01885 |
April 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lancaster |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 149 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFT DAVID L. BLANCK. COUNT I IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ETC. COUNTS II, III, IV, & V ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 12/16/21. 12/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-FAYETTE. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. PLFF. I S GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/30/17. 5/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF. AND SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-FAYETTE, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.