ESHLEMAN v. PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.

ESHLEMAN v. PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.

Plaintiff:	WILLIAM ESHLEMAN
Defendant:	PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Case Number:	5:2017cv04427
Filed:	October 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
County:	Dauphin
Presiding Judge:	JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 14, 2019	Filing 22 ORDER OF 2/14/2019 THAT UPON REVIEWING DEFENDANT PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 16), ALL SUPPORTING AND OPPOSING PAPERS, AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT PATRICK INDUSTRIES' MOTION IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/14/2019. 2/14/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(DT)
July 2, 2018	Filing 14 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (3), IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ESHLEMAN WILL BE GIVEN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTING FORTH ADDITIONAL FACTS, IF AVAILABLE, TO SUBSTANTIATE THE PERCEIVED NON-TRANSITORY NATURE OF HIS IMPAIRMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/29/18. 7/2/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 14, 2019

Filing 22 ORDER OF 2/14/2019 THAT UPON REVIEWING DEFENDANT PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 16), ALL SUPPORTING AND OPPOSING PAPERS, AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT PATRICK INDUSTRIES' MOTION IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/14/2019. 2/14/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(DT)

July 2, 2018

Filing 14 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (3), IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ESHLEMAN WILL BE GIVEN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTING FORTH ADDITIONAL FACTS, IF AVAILABLE, TO SUBSTANTIATE THE PERCEIVED NON-TRANSITORY NATURE OF HIS IMPAIRMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/29/18. 7/2/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ESHLEMAN v. PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ESHLEMAN
Represented By:	SAMUEL A. DION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?