RHOADS v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: AMY RHOADS
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Case Number: 5:2017cv04471
Filed: October 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER THAT CLERK REMOVE CASE FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE R&R (DOC. 23) ARE OVERRULED. THE R&R (DOC. 22) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED BY SEPARATE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/26/20. 2/27/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RHOADS v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMY RHOADS
Represented By: ROBERT SAVOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?