UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CINCINATTI INSURANCE COMPANY

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CINCINATTI INSURANCE COMPANY

UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CINCINATTI INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff:	UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:	CINCINATTI INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number:	5:2018cv01646
Filed:	April 19, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 23, 2019	Filing 82 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT ON DAMAGES LIMITATIONS, ECF NO. 55 , IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF THE PREVIOUS LAWSUIT AGAINST PRIZER, ECF NO. 56 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION I N LIMINE CONCERNING TRIAL CONDUCT, ECF NO. 57 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART, AS FOLLOWS; ETC. AS HEREIN. DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BIFURCATE TRIAL, ECF NO. 58 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE OLIE JOLSTAD, ECF NO. 59 , AND DAVID STEGALL, ECF NO. 60 , ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/23/19. 1/23/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
January 15, 2019	Filing 68 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY, ECF NO. 43 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IN OPPOSITION TO CINCINNATIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 53 , IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT SUMMA RY JUDGMENT RECORD, ECF NO. 54 , IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 29 , IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 45 , IS GRANTED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO LIABILITY ON COUNT I OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAI NT AND DENIED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO DAMAGES ON COUNT I. WITHIN TWO DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF SHALL SHOW CAUSE WHY SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED IN DEFENDANTS FAVOR WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS II AND III OF THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/15/19. 1/16/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 23, 2019

Filing 82 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT ON DAMAGES LIMITATIONS, ECF NO. 55 , IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF THE PREVIOUS LAWSUIT AGAINST PRIZER, ECF NO. 56 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION I N LIMINE CONCERNING TRIAL CONDUCT, ECF NO. 57 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART, AS FOLLOWS; ETC. AS HEREIN. DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BIFURCATE TRIAL, ECF NO. 58 , IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE OLIE JOLSTAD, ECF NO. 59 , AND DAVID STEGALL, ECF NO. 60 , ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/23/19. 1/23/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

January 15, 2019

Filing 68 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY, ECF NO. 43 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IN OPPOSITION TO CINCINNATIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 53 , IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT SUMMA RY JUDGMENT RECORD, ECF NO. 54 , IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 29 , IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 45 , IS GRANTED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO LIABILITY ON COUNT I OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAI NT AND DENIED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO DAMAGES ON COUNT I. WITHIN TWO DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF SHALL SHOW CAUSE WHY SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED IN DEFENDANTS FAVOR WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS II AND III OF THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/15/19. 1/16/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CINCINATTI INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By:	SYED S. AHMAD
Represented By:	GEOFFREY B. FEHLING
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CINCINATTI INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By:	WILLIAM H. CATTO
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?