VISCOMI et al v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
DAVID MASESSA, DAVID LECHTZIN, MICHAEL VISCOMI and MATTHEW PEDECINE |
JUUL LABS, INC. and PAX LABS, INC. |
5:2018cv03760 |
August 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER OF 10/24/2018 THAT AFTER CONSIDERING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY FILED BY THE DEFENDANT, JUUL LABS, INC., (DOC. NO. 15); AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO JUUL LABS, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY (DOC. NO. 15) IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFFS SHALL HAVE UNTIL NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 9, 2018, TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY. JUUL LABS, INC., SHALL HAVE A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) DAYS AFTER THE PLAINTIFFS FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY, TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF. SIGNED BY JUDGE: EDWARD G. SMITH. 10/24/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Transfer MOTION to Stay filed by DAVID LECHTZIN, DAVID MASESSA, MATTHEW PEDECINE, MICHAEL VISCOMI.Certificate of Service, Certificate of Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(PAUL, RUSSELL) |
Filing 14 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY AUSTIN V. SCHWING TO PRATICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LOVAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 10/22/18. 10/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO ATTORNEY ALONG WITH ECF REGISTRATION FORM AND E-MAILED.(mas, ) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Austin V. Schwing by JUUL LABS, INC.. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-13116801.). (KATSUR, MELANIE) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: JUUL LABS SHALL FILE ITS FIRST-FILED RULE MOTION ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 5, 2018. JUUL LABS' OBLIGATION TO OTHERWISE ANSWER OR RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12 IS STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF JUUL LABS' FIRST-FILED RULE MOTION. IN THE EVENT THAT THE COURT DENIES JUUL LABS' FIRST-FILED RULE MOTION IN ITS ENTIRETY, JUUL LABS SHALL ANSWER OR RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12 NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING ENTRY OF THE COURT'S ORDER DENYING JUUL LABS' FIRST-FILED RULE MOTION. THIS STIPULATION SHALL NOT SERVE TO WAIVE ANY RIGHT, DEFENSE, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, OR OBJECTION, INCLUDING THE FILING OF AN AMENDED PLEADING, LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, IMPROPER VENUE, AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 10/16/18. 10/16/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, ) |
Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by JUUL LABS, INC.. (SEE #9 FOR ATTACHMENT)(lvj, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Transfer , MOTION to Stay filed by JUUL LABS, INC..Memorandum, Declaration, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support Of Motion, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion, #3 Declaration of Danna McKay In Support of Motion, #4 Exhibit A to McKay Declaration, #5 Declaration of Austin V. Schwing In Support of Motion, #6 Exhibit 1 to Schwing Declaration, #7 Exhibit 2 to Schwing Declaration)(KATSUR, MELANIE) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Postpone Obligation to Respond to Complaint Pending Resolution of Forthcoming Motion by JUUL LABS, INC.. (KATSUR, MELANIE) Modified on 10/15/2018 (lvj, ). (FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY; FORWARD TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL) |
Filing 9 Statement re Corporate Disclosure Under Rule 7.1 by JUUL LABS, INC.. (KATSUR, MELANIE) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by MELANIE L. KATSUR on behalf of JUUL LABS, INC. with Certificate of Service(KATSUR, MELANIE) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE COURT HEREBY ADOPTS THE STIPULATION AND ORDERS THE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS AGAINS PAX LABS, INC. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/18/18. 9/19/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, ) Modified on 9/19/2018 (mas, ). |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendant PAX Labs, Inc. by DAVID LECHTZIN, DAVID MASESSA, MATTHEW PEDECINE, MICHAEL VISCOMI. (PAUL, RUSSELL) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by BARBARA A. PODELL on behalf of DAVID LECHTZIN, DAVID MASESSA, MATTHEW PEDECINE, MICHAEL VISCOMI (PODELL, BARBARA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by SHERRIE R. SAVETT on behalf of DAVID LECHTZIN, DAVID MASESSA, MATTHEW PEDECINE, MICHAEL VISCOMI (SAVETT, SHERRIE) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MICHAEL VISCOMI, DAVID MASESSA, DAVID LECHTZIN, MATTHEW PEDECINE. JUUL LABS, INC. waiver sent on 9/5/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (PAUL, RUSSELL) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by AARON J. FREIWALD on behalf of DAVID LECHTZIN, DAVID MASESSA, MATTHEW PEDECINE, MICHAEL VISCOMI (FREIWALD, AARON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE184100.), filed by MICHAEL VISCOMI, DAVID MASESSA, DAVID LECHTZIN, MATTHEW PEDECINE, JURY DEMAND. (Attachments: #1 CASE FORMS)(jl, ) |
2 Summons Issued as to JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC.. Forwarded To: RUSSELL PAUL on 9/5/18 (jl, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DAVID LECHTZIN, DAVID MASESSA, MATTHEW PEDECINE, MICHAEL VISCOMI. (jl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.