KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
| EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 5:2018cv04071 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Other Statutes: Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re #9 Notice of Appeal filed by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY. USCA Case Number 18-3274 (dmc, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY. IFP (IFP GRANTED) Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk, Certificate of Service. (er, ) (Main Document 9 replaced on 10/12/2018) (er, ). Modified on 10/12/2018 (er, ). |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF STANDING FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. KENNEDY IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER, ETC. UPON FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED. IF KENNEDY FAILS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. KENNEDYS MOTION TO ORDER STATUTE VOID IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THIS TIME. KENNEDY'S MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO FILE ELECTORNICALLY IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THIS TIME. TO THE EXTENT KENNEDY'S FILING "TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE" REQUESTS THAT THE CORRUPT ACCEPT HIS FILINGS AND ASSIGN A JUDGE THE REQUESTS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/26/18. 9/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(rf, ) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/26/18. 9/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(rf, ) |
| Filing 5 TAKE JUDICIAL COGNIZANCE by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY (er, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY filed by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY..(er, ) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (er, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO ORDER STATUTE VOID filed by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY, MEMORANDUM. (er, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, filed by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY. (IFP PENDING). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(er, ) Modified on 9/27/2018 (dt, ). |
| Filing 1 AFFIDAVIT ACCOMPANYING MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY. (er, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
