ARDO et al v. PAGAN et al
JEAN MONAGHAN and ANGELO ARDO |
OFFICER JAY SPLAIN and OFFICER EDDIE PAGAN |
5:2018cv05217 |
December 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
P.I.: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted by ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN as to EDDIE PAGAN, JAY SPLAIN. (jl, ) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted by ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN as to JAY SPLAIN. (jl, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN re: CHAD SPOTTS served Summons and Complaint upon JAY SPLAIN by PERSONAL SERVICE. JAY SPLAIN served on 1/9/2019, answer due 1/30/2019. (jl, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN re: CHAD SPOTS served Summons and Complaint upon EDDIE PAGAN by PERSONAL SERVICE. EDDIE PAGAN served on 1/3/2019, answer due 1/24/2019. (jl, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW B. WEISBERG on behalf of ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN with Certificate of Service and Jury Demand(WEISBERG, MATTHEW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EDDIE PAGAN, JAY SPLAIN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE188858.) filed by ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN.(jaa, ) |
2 Summons Issued as to EDDIE PAGAN, JAY SPLAIN. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 12/6/18 (jaa, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ANGELO ARDO, JEAN MONAGHAN. (jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.