HERNANDEZ v. SMITH et al
| MELVIN ANTHONY HERNANDEZ |
| BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 5:2019cv00508 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| LINDA K CARACAPPA |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF 2/14/2019 THAT THE PRO SE PETITIONER, MELVIN ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, HAVING FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 (DOC NO. 1), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE LINDA K. CARACAPPA, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA, WITH A COPY OF THE HABEAS PETITION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER INTO CIVIL SUSPENSE UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE: EDWARD G. SMITH. 2/14/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA. (DT)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 191999.), filed by MELVIN ANTHONY HERNANDEZ. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
