WENTZEL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff: THOMAS J. WENTZEL
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Number: 5:2019cv00688
Filed: February 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GERALD J PAPPERT
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26:6672
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by THOMAS J. WENTZEL re Summons Issued (LUTZ, GEORGE)
February 19, 2019 1 Original Summons Issued as to INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Forwarded To: Counsel on 2/19/2019 (DT)
February 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number APE5007.), filed by THOMAS J. WENTZEL.(DT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WENTZEL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS J. WENTZEL
Represented By: GEORGE M. LUTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?