MILES et al v. RAVIN CROSSBOWS et al
JUDY MILES and CHARLES G. MILES |
RAVIN CROSSBOWS, VELOCITY OUTDOOR, INC., A1 ARCHERY SUPPLY, RAVIN CROSSBOWS, LLC and A-1 ARCHERY, INC. |
5:2019cv01551 |
April 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Ravin Crossbows, LLC's sole member is Velocity Outdoor, Inc. Velocity Outdoor, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of CBCP Acquisition Corp. CBCP Acquisition Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of CBCP Products, LLC. CBCP Products, LLC's sole member is Compass Diversified Holdings, Inc. with Certificate of Service by RAVIN CROSSBOWS, RAVIN CROSSBOWS, LLC, VELOCITY OUTDOOR, INC..(ROSKOVENSKY, VINCENT) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by RAVIN CROSSBOWS, RAVIN CROSSBOWS, LLC, VELOCITY OUTDOOR, INC., Affirmative Defenses, Jury Demand, Certificate of Service.(ROSKOVENSKY, VINCENT) Modified on 4/12/2019 (md). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAVIN CROSSBOWS, RAVIN CROSSBOWS, LLC, VELOCITY OUTDOOR, INC. from LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, case number 19-02351. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 195603) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.