BARTLES v. BERRYHILL
DAVID ALAN BARTLES |
NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
5:2019cv01910 |
May 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
THOMAS J RUETER |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Procedural Order 5/6/19 Entered and copies mailed and e-mailed. (fdc, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE U.S. MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRCP 4(i). SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 5/6/19.5/6/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY FORWARDED TO U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. (fdc) |
Summons Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: U.S. Marshal Service, U.S. Attorney's Office on 5/6/19 (fdc, ) |
Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent)(mbh, ) |
Filing 2 Complaint against NANCY A. BERRYHILL filed by DAVID ALAN BARTLES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Coversheets)(mbh, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY DAVID ALAN BARTLES.(mbh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.