PELZ et al v. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP
| MATTHEW SCHNAUFFER and AMY PELZ |
| FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP |
| 5:2019cv03480 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b) AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2019, it having been reported that the parties have settled the above-captioned action, and pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs. 9/9/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sres, )
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MARIA K. MCGINTY-FERRIS on behalf of all plaintiffs (MCGINTY-FERRIS, MARIA) Modified on 8/8/2019 (lvj, ). |
| One Summons Issued as to FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP. Forwarded To: BRANDON A. SWARTZ, ESQ. on 8/2/2019 (dmc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE201396.), filed by AMY PELZ, MATTHEW SCHNAUFFER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(dmc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
