HIGH v. AEROTEK, INC.
| ZACHARY HIGH |
| AEROTEK, INC. |
| 5:2019cv04126 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF SCHEDULING OF INITIAL FED.R.CIV.P. 16 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: AN INITIAL FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 16 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2019, AT 4:00 P.M. BEFORE THE HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. AT THE EDWARD N. CAHN U.S. COURTHOUSE AND FEDERAL BUILDING, COURTROOM C, THIRD FLOOR, 504 WEST HAMILTON STREET, ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.(dja, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER OF 10/4/2019 THAT THE APPLICAITON OF WILLIAM E. CORUM, EQUIRE, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LRCP 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 10/4/19. 10/4/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dt)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of William E. Corum by AEROTEK, INC... (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(STEELE, HEATHER) Modified on 10/4/2019 (mbh, ). (FEE PAID ON 10/3/19) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by AEROTEK, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(STEELE, HEATHER) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF 9/13/2019 THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: THE STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND GRANTED IN PART AND DISAPPROVED AND DENIED IN PART; AND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, ONLY, AND FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE, IS EXTENDED THROUGH AND INCLUDING SEPTEMBER 29, 2019. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/13/2019. 9/16/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(DT)
|
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Aerotek Holdings, LLC with Certificate of Service by AEROTEK, INC..(STEELE, HEATHER) |
| Filing 3 INITIAL PROCEDURAL ORDER OF 9/11/2019. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/11/19. 9/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(DT) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by ADAM C. LEASE on behalf of ZACHARY HIGH (LEASE, ADAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AEROTEK, INC. from Berks County Court of Common Pleas, case number 19-15667. Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 203387) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Designation Form, #5 Case Management Track Form)(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HIGH v. AEROTEK, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AEROTEK, INC. | |
| Represented By: | HEATHER ZALAR STEELE |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM E. CORUM |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ZACHARY HIGH | |
| Represented By: | ARI RISSON KARPF |
| Represented By: | ADAM C. LEASE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
