DIEFFENBACH v. SAUL
KATHRN E. DIEFFENBACH |
ANDREW SAUL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
5:2019cv04948 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Social Security Magistrate Consent by KATHRN E. DIEFFENBACH.. (GROMEN, RICHARD) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by KATHRN E. DIEFFENBACH re #2 Procedural Order, #1 Complaint, Summons Issued as to USA (GROMEN, RICHARD) |
Filing 5 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(amas) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by KATHRN E. DIEFFENBACH re #3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney, #2 Procedural Order, #1 Complaint, Summons Issued as to USA (GROMEN, RICHARD) |
Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (fdc, ) |
Filing 2 Social Security Standing Procedural Order 10/24/2019 Entered and copies e-mailed. (amas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHRN E. DIEFFENBACH ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 205621.), filed by KATHRN E. DIEFFENBACH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: 2 COPIES TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AND 1 TO THE US ATTY on 10/24/2019 (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.