KUFRO v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
| CHAD KUFRO |
| JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC. and PHILLIP MORRIS, U.S.A. INC. |
| 5:2019cv05259 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Original record transferred to the Northern District of California via interdistrict transfer system.(lisad, ) |
| Filing 2 Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order, THAT THE ACTION ON THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE ARE TRANSFERRED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1407 TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ORDER OF 10/2/2019, AND, WITH THE CONSENT OF THAT OCURT, ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK, III. (sg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALTRIA GROUP, INC., JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILLIP MORRIS, U.S.A. INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 206516.), filed by CHAD KUFRO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
| 4 Summons Issued as to ALTRIA GROUP, INC., JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILLIP MORRIS, U.S.A. INC.. Forwarded To: PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 11/8/2019 (amas) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CHAD KUFRO. (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
