JANE DOE v. DUNKIN' DONUTS et al
| JANE DOE |
| DUNKIN' DONUTS and TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC |
| 5:2019cv05275 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DUNKIN' DONUTS, TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC; jury demand, Certificate of Service, filed by PLFF JANE DOE.(kw, ) |
| (1) Summons on Amended Complaint Issued as to DUNKIN' DONUTS. Forwarded To: counsel on 1/6/20. (kw, ) |
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Order to Proceed Anonymously/File Under Pseudonym filed by JANE DOE.Brief, Proposed Order, Certificate of Non-Concurrence, Certificate of Service.(ROBINETTE, JUSTIN) |
| Filing 10 DEFAULT NOTICE to all Parties that a review of the Courts records indicates that Defendant, Dunkin Donuts, has failed to timely respond to the Complaint.1If Plaintiff fails to take action to have a default entered against Defendant, Dunkin Donuts, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) within ten (10) days of the date of this Notice, the Court may enter an Order dismissing the Complaint against said Defendant for lack of prosecution. (mas, ) Modified on 12/26/2019 (mas, ). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC re #7 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM NonConcurrence (SCOMILLIO, VICTOR) |
| Filing 8 Brief in support of motion RE #7 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC.(SCOMILLIO, VICTOR) Modified on 12/30/2019 (tjd). |
| Filing 7 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STAY filed by TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC.motion.(SCOMILLIO, VICTOR) Modified on 12/30/2019 (tjd). |
Filing 6
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY, ECF NO. 2, IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO REFILE AFTER ALL DEFENDANTS HAVE BEEN SERVED, THE TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING HAS PASSED, AND PLAINTIFF HAS FULFILLED HER OBLIGATIONS TO "CONTACT OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THOROUGHLY THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONTEMPLATED MOTION AND ANY POTENTIAL RESOLUTION OF IT," SEE ECF NO. 3. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 12/13/19.12/16/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(er, )
|
| Filing 5 Summons Returned Executed by Kendra Day re: served Summons and Complaint, Procedural Order upon Manager, Carlos Lopez by Personal on 12/2/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (ROBINETTE, JUSTIN) Modified on 12/10/2019 (tjd). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by VICTOR E. SCOMILLIO on behalf of TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC with Jury Demand(SCOMILLIO, VICTOR) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF[S] MUST SERVE THIS ORDER ON EVERY PARTY TO THIS CASE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PARTYS FIRST APPEARANCE, UNLESS THIS CASE WAS REMOVED FROM STATE COURT, IN WHICH CASE THIS RESPONSIBILITY FALLS ON COUNSEL FOR THE PARTY WHO REMOVED THE CASE; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 11/12/19. 11/12/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY filed by JANE DOE..(bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DUNKIN' DONUTS, TRIANGLE DOUGHNUTS, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE206563.), filed by JANE DOE.(bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JANE DOE. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
