KEBECHET EL v. INGERMAN et al
Plaintiff: PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL
Defendant: BRAD M. INGERMAN and THE WILLOWS AT LANDISVILLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INGERMAN
Case Number: 5:2019cv05370
Filed: November 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M YOUNGE
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION BY PRO SE PLAINTIFF PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL, TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (DT)
December 27, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE by PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL. (IN PERSON FILING) (DT)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #5 SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 12/20/19.12/20/19 ENTERED AND COPY MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF. NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS MAILED TO PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL. (fdc)
December 12, 2019 Filing 5 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (DT) (IN PERSON FILING)
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUFFICIENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO ALLOW THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER SHE HAS THE MEANS TO PAY THE FILING FEE TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 11/25/19.11/26/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE & UNREPS. NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS MAILED TO PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL. (fdc)
November 12, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mas, )
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BRAD M. INGERMAN, THE WILLOWS AT LANDISVILLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INGERMAN, filed by PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mas, )
November 12, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS FILED BY PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION. (mas, )
November 12, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL. (mas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KEBECHET EL v. INGERMAN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRAD M. INGERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE WILLOWS AT LANDISVILLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INGERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PRINCESA CANDELITA EL MITCHKEBE KEBECHET EL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?