MERRITT v. POLINSKY et al
| ROBERT MERRITT |
| COUNTY OF READING, GRETERFOR PRISON AND MOUNT GUMMERY COUNTY, CAROL SCHULTZ, DAVID BERDGLE, KEYS, GREGORY POLINSKY and LYNN |
| 5:2020cv00739 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OF 3/18/20 THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRNATED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2(B)(ii) FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. MERRITT MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND MERRIT A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S FORM COMPLAINT. ETC. MERRITT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THIS TIME. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/18/20. 3/19/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF WITH FORM COMPLAINT. (DT) (COPY SENT TO WARDEN NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL) Modified on 3/20/2020 (lisad, ).
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION OF 3/18/20. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/18/20. 3/19/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(DT) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address filed by ROBERT MERRITT. No envelope included. (mas, ) Modified on 3/18/2020 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 8 MOTION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF ROBERT MERRITT FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. (DT) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by PRO SE PLAINTIFF ROBERT MERRITT. (DT) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF ROBERT MERRITT TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (DT) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF 2/19/20 THAT PLAINTIFF ROBERT MERRITT HAVING SUBMITTED A COMPLAINT TO THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IT IS ORDERED THAT: IF MERRITT SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY THE $400 TO THE COURT OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH MERRITT WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACITON NUMBER. ETC. MERRITT'S MOTION FOR SERVICE (DOC. NO. 3) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURE. IF MERRITT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/20/20. 2/20/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF WITH IFP FORM. (DT)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION TO REQUEST Counsel filed by ROBERT MERRITT..(bw, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Service filed by ROBERT MERRITT..(bw, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAVID BERDGLE, COUNTY OF READING, KEYS, LYNN, GREGORY POLINSKY, CAROL SCHULTZ, GRETERFOR PRISON AND MOUNT GUMMERY COUNTY filed by ROBERT MERRITT. (NO FEE PAID, NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) Modified on 2/13/2020 (lisad, ). (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/14/2020) (bw, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
