WILLIAMS v. STATE FARM
| THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR. |
| STATE FARM |
| FERNANDO MADEIRA and CLARE MADEIRA |
| 5:2020cv03337 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF SCHEDULING OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE: A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH THE HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2020, AT 4:00 P.M. CONCERNING THIS CASE. SEE NOTICE FOR CALL-IN INFORMATION.(dja, ) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint In Part Supplemental Answer with Exhibit filed by THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service cert Service of Supplemental Answer, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Assignment of bad faith Claims)(ALMONTI, ANGELO) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE to all Parties thata review of the Courts records indicates that the Third Party Defendants have failed to timely respond to the Third Party Complaint. If the Third Party Plaintiff fails to take action to have a default entered against the Third Party Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) within ten (10) days of thedate of this Notice, the Court may enter an Order dismissing the Third Party Complaint for lackof prosecution. (mas, ) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint In Part filed by STATE FARM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(PUGA, JAVIER) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Dennis Richman re: served Third Party Complaint upon Clare Madeira by personally served on 7/21/20 (PAYNE, WESLEY) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Dennis Richman re: served Third Party Complaint upon Fernando Madeira by personaly served on 7/21/20 (PAYNE, WESLEY) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by JAVIER PUGA on behalf of STATE FARM with Certificate of Service(PUGA, JAVIER) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint In Part filed by THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR. (Attachments: #1 Brief Plaintiff's Brief is Response to Defendant's Rule 12 Motion, #2 Text of Proposed Order Plaintiff's Proposed Order Denying Motion, #3 Certificate of Service)(ALMONTI, ANGELO) |
| Filing 6 INTERPLEADER by STATE FARM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(PAYNE, WESLEY). (FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY; SUMMONS ALREADY PREPARED BY CLERK'S OFFICE). Modified on 7/22/2020 (fb). |
| THIRD PARTY Summons Issued as to CLARE MADEIRA, FERNANDO MADEIRA. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO THIRD PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 7/21/20 (JL ) |
| THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against CLARE MADEIRA, FERNANDO MADEIRA, filed by STATE FARM. (SEE PAPER #5 FOR ATTACHMENT).(fb) |
| Filing 5 INTERPLEADER by STATE FARM. (PAYNE, WESLEY) |
| Filing 4 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County. (nd, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint In Part filed by STATE FARM.Memorandum in Support, Certificate of Service.(PAYNE, WESLEY) |
Filing 2
INITIAL PROCEDURAL ORDER OF 7/9/20. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON JR ON 7/9/20. 7/9/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STATE FARM (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14406974), filed by STATE FARM.(PAYNE, WESLEY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
