BINGHAM v. CITY OF READING, PA et al
TRENTAIR BINGHAM |
JASMINE SANCHEZ and CITY OF READING, PA |
5:2020cv03516 |
July 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PLEADING #3 RETURNED AS TO TRENTAIR BINGHAM (JL ) |
Document #4 mailed to pro se litigant with Form. (nd, ) |
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF MUST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PAY THE $400.00 FILING FEWE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE SIX(6) MONTH PERIOD FORM 1/16/20 THROUGH 7/16/20. THE CLERK SHALL FURNISH PLAINTIFF WITH A BLANK COPY OPF THIS COURT'S CURRENT IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION BEARING THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO CP\OMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 7/24/20. 7/24/20 ENTERED AND COPIES OF ORDER AND FORMS NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(jpd, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 Letter dated 7/16/20 by TRENTAIR BINGHAM (fdc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF READING, PA, JASMINE SANCHEZ, filed by TRENTAIR BINGHAM. (NO IFP, NE FEE PAID) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Case Management Track Form)(fdc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.