HO-SUE et al v. TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P.
Plaintiff: DEBRA HO-SUE and HOWARD HO-SUE
Defendant: TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P.
Case Number: 5:2020cv03639
Filed: July 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M GALLAGHER
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2020 Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DEBRA HO-SUE, HOWARD HO-SUE. (GALLAGHER, MATTHEW)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER THAT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 5/12/2021 01:30 PM BEFORE HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER; DISCOVERY DUE BY 2/23/2021; MOTIONS DUE BY 9/29/2020; MOTION IN LIMINE DUE BY 4/27/2021; MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE BY 3/9/2021; PLAINTIFF PRETRIAL MEMO DUE BY 4/20/2021; DEFENDANT PRETRIAL MEMO DUE BY 4/20/2021; TRIAL DATE SET FOR 5/14/2021 09:00 AM BEFORE HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 8/27/20. 8/27/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
August 27, 2020 Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER. Telephone Conference held on 8/27/20. (mas, )
August 26, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P..Brief, Certificate of Service.(SHEINEN, STEPHEN)
August 14, 2020 Filing 6 Report Of JOINT RULE 26(f) by TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P.. (SHEINEN, STEPHEN)
August 5, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing: A Rule 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET via TELEPHONE FOR 8/27/2020 11:30 AM BEFORE HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER.(DT)
July 31, 2020 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P..(SHEINEN, STEPHEN)
July 28, 2020 Filing 3 Arbitration Certification that case exceeds the sum of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs or relief other than monetary damages is sought (GALLAGHER, MATTHEW)
July 27, 2020 Case Eligible for Arbitration(lisad, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW E. GALLAGHER on behalf of DEBRA HO-SUE, HOWARD HO-SUE (GALLAGHER, MATTHEW)
July 27, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14450719), filed by TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P..(SHEINEN, STEPHEN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HO-SUE et al v. TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEBRA HO-SUE
Represented By: MATTHEW E. GALLAGHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HOWARD HO-SUE
Represented By: MATTHEW E. GALLAGHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRIPLE NET INVESTMENTS, XXII L.P.
Represented By: STEPHEN A. SHEINEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?