WASHINGTON v. SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK et al
Petitioner: CHARLES DEMAI WASHINGTON
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK
Case Number: 5:2020cv03868
Filed: August 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JACOB P HART
Referring Judge: JOEL H SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2020 Document Nos. 6 & 7 mailed to pro se petitioner. (kw, )
September 18, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by HEATHER F. GALLAGHER on behalf of THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH with Certificate of Service(GALLAGHER, HEATHER)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY IS ADDED AS A PARTY RESPONDENT AND THE CAPTION IS HEREBY SO AMENDED. THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. CHARLES DEMAI WASHINGTON, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH,CP-39-CR002109-2014 WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 11/19/2020.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 9/18/20. 9/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. COPIES OF PETITION #2 REFERRAL ORDER #6 ORDER FOR REC. AND RESPONSE #7 AND DOCKET TO DA LEHIGH COUNTY AND COPY ORDER #7 E-MAILED/FAXED TO CLERK OF C.C.P. LEHIGH COUNTY.(jpd, )
September 18, 2020 COPIES OF PETITION #2 REFERRAL ORDER #6 ORDER FOR REC. AND RESPONSE #7 AND DOCKET TO DA LEHIGH COUNTY AND COPY ORDER #7 E-MAILED/FAXED TO CLERK OF C.C.P. LEHIGH COUNTY.(jpd, )
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE JACOB P. HART, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE LEHIGH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL - CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/17/20. 9/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND COPIES OF PETITION #2 ORDER #6 AND DOCKET EMAILED TO DA LEHIGH COUNTY AND PA ATTY. GEN. CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION. (jpd)
September 17, 2020 COPIES OF PETITION #2 ORDER #6 AND DOCKET EMAILED TO DA LEHIGH COUNTY AND PA ATTY. GE. CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION. (jpd)
September 15, 2020 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE218840 (JL )
August 31, 2020 Filing 5 Letter dated 8/25/20 by CHARLES DEMAI WASHINGTON (jpd, )
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE THE FORM SUBMITTED DID NOT INCLUDE THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISONER'S INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT BALANCE. IF WASHINGTON SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER EITHER PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH WASHINGTON WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/12/20.8/12/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND IFP FORM NOT MAILED.(kw, )
August 12, 2020 DOC. NO. #4 MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP FORMS ON 8/12/20. (amas, )
August 11, 2020 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
August 3, 2020 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CHARLES DEMAI WASHINGTON. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) Modified on 8/10/2020 (bw, ).
August 3, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CHARLES DEMAI WASHINGTON..(bw, ) Modified on 8/10/2020 (bw, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WASHINGTON v. SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH
Represented By: HEATHER F. GALLAGHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CHARLES DEMAI WASHINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?