LAWRENCE v. CAPOZZA et al
Petitioner: RICHARD E. LAWRENCE
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and MARK V. CAPOZZA
Case Number: 5:2020cv04633
Filed: September 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: TIMOTHY R RICE
Referring Judge: PETRESE B TUCKER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Filing 8 Application for Extension of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER.Application for Extension of Time to Answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.(SEIDERS, GREGORY) Modified on 11/18/2020 (tjd).
October 22, 2020 STATE COURT RECORD PLACED IN MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICE MAIL BIN ON 10/22/20 BY THE CLERKS OFFICE. (jpd, )
October 22, 2020 STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED ON 10/22/20 FROM THE C.C.P. LANCASTER COUNTY AND FORWARDED TO THE CHAMBERS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICE(jpd, )
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 10/7/20.10/7/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh, )
October 7, 2020 COPY OF ORDER #7 MAILED TO LAWRENCE. (fdc)
October 5, 2020 MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #4 TO PETITIONER ON 10/5/20. (jaa, )
October 2, 2020 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by RICHARD E. LAWRENCE. (jpd, )
October 2, 2020 Filing 5 PETITIONER RICHARD E. LAWRENCE'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Motions referred to TIMOTHY R. RICE.(jpd, )
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED THAT BY NOVEMBER 16, 2020, THE CLERK FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS, BRIEFS, AND NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, TRIAL, SENTENCING, AND POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, IN COMMONWEALTH V. LAWRENCE, CP-36-CR-0003170-2012; BY NOVEMBER 30, 2020, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER TO THE CLAIMS IN PETITIONER LAWRENCES HABEAS PETITION AND A SUPPORTING LEGAL MEMORANDUM PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254; BY DECEMBER 30, 2020, OR ONE MONTH AFTER THE COMMONWEALTH SUBMITS ITS RESPONSE, PETITIONER MAY FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONSE. SEE RULE 5(E), 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254 AND AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. 3771(B)(2), THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL ENSURE THAT ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIME VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED JULY 27, 2006. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 10/1/20. 10/1/20 ENTERED AND COPIES FAXED/E-MAILED TO CLERK FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY AND NOT MAILED TO PETITIONER.(jaa, )
October 1, 2020 COPY OF PETITION (DOC.1); ORDER (DOC.4) AND DOCKET SHEET FORWARDED BY EMAIL TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY. (jaa, )
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL - CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 10/1/20. 10/1/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND COPIES OF PETITION #1 ORDER #2 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO THE DA LANCASTER COUNTY. PA ATTY. GEN CRIM-DIV.(jpd, )
October 1, 2020 COPIES OF PETITION #1 ORDER #2 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO THE DA LANCASTER COUNTY. PA ATTY. GEN CRIM-DIV.(jpd,)
September 23, 2020 Filing Fee for HABEAS CORPUS by RICHARD E. LAWRENCE. (Filing Fee $5, (Filing fee $ 5. PPE219229) (jaa, )
September 11, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. (fdc)
September 11, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RICHARD E. LAWRENCE. (NO IFP - NO FEE PAID) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(fdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAWRENCE v. CAPOZZA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER
Represented By: GREGORY TYLER SEIDERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK V. CAPOZZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RICHARD E. LAWRENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?