BLIESATH v. GOOGLE et al
| JADIN MICHAEL BLIESATH |
| APPLE, FACEBOOK and GOOGLE |
| 5:2020cv05397 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M GALLAGHER |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT #1 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. THE COMPLAINTS ARE DEEMED FILED. 3. BLIESATHS COMPLAINTS ARE DISMISSEDWITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(I), FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THESE CASES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 12/23/20. 12/23/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 12/23/20. 12/23/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(mas, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. (dt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against APPLE, FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, filed by JADIN MICHAEL BLIESATH.(IFP PENDING) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Case Management Track Form)(ENVELOPE ATTACHED)(dt, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF JADIN MICHAEL BLIESATH TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (DT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
