JONES v. GESSNER
Plaintiff: COREY JONES
Defendant: M.D. VICTORIA GESSNER and VICTORIA GESSNER
Case Number: 5:2020cv06004
Filed: November 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G SMITH
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE CONDUCTED VIA TELEPHONE Please be advised that an initial pretrial conference to be conducted via telephone before Judge Edward G. Smith in the above-captioned case has been scheduled for THURSDAY, JANUARY 28, 2021, at 10:30 a.m. Counsel for all the parties will use dial in number 1-571-353-2300 and use pin 363 973 916# to enter the conference call. A copy of the Policies and Procedures for Judge Smith is available on the courts website at https://www.paed.uscourts.gov. Prior to the initial pretrial conference, the parties should confer and prepare a joint report pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). This joint report should be e-mailed to chambers no later than three days prior to the initial pretrial conference. The parties shall commence discovery immediately. Requests to reschedule this conference are strongly discouraged, and the conference will only be continued when compelling circumstances so require. (sres, )
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint together with with Affirmative Defenses by VICTORIA GESSNER.(NINOSKY, JOHN)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by VICTORIA GESSNER. VICTORIA GESSNER waiver sent on 12/1/2020, answer due 1/30/2021. (NINOSKY, JOHN)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by JOHN R. NINOSKY on behalf of VICTORIA GESSNER with Certificate of Service(NINOSKY, JOHN)
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to VICTORIA GESSNER. EMAILED To: COUNSEL on 12/1/20 (jaa, )
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order DEMAND for Trial by Jury by COREY JONES. (lisad, )
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VICTORIA GESSNER ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14745086.), filed by COREY JONES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(GECKLE, PATRICK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JONES v. GESSNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M.D. VICTORIA GESSNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VICTORIA GESSNER
Represented By: JOHN R. NINOSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COREY JONES
Represented By: PATRICK G. GECKLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?