ROSE v. HOFFMAN INSURANCE et al
Petitioner: JIMI ROSE
Respondent: RYAN STOCKER, MARK HOFFMAN, BASHKIM HUSENAJ and HOFFMAN INSURANCE
Case Number: 5:2020cv06217
Filed: December 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JEFFREY L SCHMEHL
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2021 Filing 8 Letter dated 1/15/21 by JIMI ROSE (fdc)
January 20, 2021 Filing 7 JIMI ROSE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(JL )
January 20, 2021 Filing 6 JIMI ROSE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, IN ORDER TO PREVENT A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND NEW MATTER PURSUANT TO 28 USC SS 1367 NUNC PRO TUNC.(JL )
January 5, 2021 COPY OF DOC. NOS. 4 AND 5 HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, ROSE. (bw, )
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF 1/4/21 THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF JIMI ROSE'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 1) AND HIS PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF (ECF NO. 2), IT IS ORDERED THAT: LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. ROSE'S PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF (ECF NO. 2) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/4/21. 1/4/21 ENTERED. (DT) (COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)
January 4, 2021 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION OF 1/4/21. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/4/21. 1/4/21 ENTERED AND COPIES. (DT)(COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)
December 10, 2020 COPY OF NOTICE OF PRO SE GUIDELINES #3 MAILED TO ROSE. (fdc)
December 9, 2020 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
December 9, 2020 Filing 2 PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF PURSUANT TO MANIFEST INJUSTICE DUE TO THIS HONORABLE COURT'S RULING ON THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2018 NUNC PRO TUNC by JIMI ROSE. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(bw, )
December 9, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JIMI ROSE..(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROSE v. HOFFMAN INSURANCE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RYAN STOCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK HOFFMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BASHKIM HUSENAJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HOFFMAN INSURANCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JIMI ROSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?