BOYLE v. SCOTT CARS, L.P. et al
| DONALD BOYLE |
| SCOTT CARS, L.P., SCOTT CARS, INC., RICHARD D. SALEZZE, SAR ASSOCIATES, LLC and ANDREW M. SCOTT |
| 5:2020cv06567 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M GALLAGHER |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHANIE NOLAN DEVINEY on behalf of RICHARD D. SALEZZE, SAR ASSOCIATES, LLC, ANDREW M. SCOTT, SCOTT CARS, INC., SCOTT CARS, L.P. with Certificate of Service(DEVINEY, STEPHANIE) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by RANDALL C. SCHAUER on behalf of RICHARD D. SALEZZE, SAR ASSOCIATES, LLC, ANDREW M. SCOTT, SCOTT CARS, INC., SCOTT CARS, L.P. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service of Entry of Appearance of Randall C. Schauer, Esq.)(SCHAUER, RANDALL) |
| Summons Issued as to RICHARD D. SALEZZE, SAR ASSOCIATES, LLC, ANDREW M. SCOTT, SCOTT CARS, INC., SCOTT CARS, L.P.. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 1/4/21 (JL ) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DONALD BOYLE. (RHOADS, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14813248.), filed by DONALD BOYLE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(RHOADS, STEPHEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
