CINTRON v. PENCHISHEN et al
MICHAEL CINTRON |
DAVID COLLINS, DAVID PENCHISHEN, BLANE BRANDON and JOHN HARMEN |
5:2021cv01140 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSEPH F LEESON |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by MICHAEL CINTRON. (jpd, ) |
DOC. 4 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF 3/11/21 THAT PLAINTIFF MICHAEL CINTRON HAS FAILED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD PRIOR TO FILING OF THIS CIVIL ACTION ON MARCH 9, 2021, AS REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. 1) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IF CINTRON SEEKS TO PROCEED IN IFP, HE SHALL, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ETC. IF CINTRON FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON JR ON 3/12/21. 3/12/21 ENTERED. (DT) (COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE) |
PLEADING #3 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BLANE BRANDON, DAVID COLLINS, JOHN HARMEN, DAVID PENCHISHEN, filed by MICHAEL CINTRON.(bw, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MICHAEL CINTRON..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.