Nye v. SAUL
| Tammy Nye |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| 5:2021cv01713 |
| April 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY R RICE |
| JOSHUA D WOLSON |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 6/8/21. 6/8/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS RANDOMLY REASSIGNED TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JOSHUA D. WOLSON, DISTRICT JUDGE. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 6/7/21. 6/7/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 6 Social Security Declining Magistrate Consent by Tammy Nye.. (MARZZACCO, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 4 Procedural Order 4/13/21 Entered and copies e-mailed. (Attachments: #1 STANDING PROCEDURAL ORDER FOR CASES SEEKING SOCIAL SECURITY REVIEW)(jaa, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(I) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA THE COURTS CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILES SYSTEM (CM/ECF), UPON: THE OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL, REGION III, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA; AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE CLERKS OFFICE WILL ENSURE THAT CM/ECF NOTIFICATIONS INDICATING THAT THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED, AND SUMMONSES HAVE BEEN ISSUED, ARE SENT TO OGC.EDPA.COMPLAINTS@SSA.GOV AND USAPAE.SSACOMPLAINTS@USDOJ.GOV. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 4/13/21.4/13/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 5 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tammy Nye.Affidavit.(MARZZACCO, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tammy Nye. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Exhibit ALJ UFD, #5 Exhibit AC UFD)(MARZZACCO, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nye v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW SAUL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy Nye | |
| Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER J. MARZZACCO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
