WILLIAMS v. RUSSELL et al
DELANO J. WILLIAMS |
ROBERT MCFADDEN, JANE DOE/JOHN DOE, STEVEN MILLER and KYLE RUSSELL |
5:2021cv01813 |
April 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915A(B)(1), FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM AND WILLIAMS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST IDENTIFY ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ADDITION TO IDENTIFYING THEM IN THE BODY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SHALL STATE THE BASIS FOR WILLIAMSS CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE A COMPLETE DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT RELY ON THE INITIAL COMPLAINT OR OTHER PAPERS FILED IN THIS CASE TO STATE A CLAIM. WHEN DRAFTING HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT, WILLIAMS SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF THE COURTS REASONS FOR DISMISSING THE CLAIMS IN HIS INITIAL COMPLAINT AS EXPLAINED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 5/27/21. 5/27/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, ) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 5/27/21. 5/27/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, ) |
DOCS # 6 & 7 ALONG WITH 1983 COMPLAINT MAILED TO WILLIAMS (rf, ) |
Filing Fee for COMPLAINT by DELANO J. WILLIAMS. (Filing Fee $402, (Filing fee $ 402.) (jaa, ) |
DOC. 4 AND 5 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) |
Filing 5 ORDERED THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE HENRY S. PERKIN. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 4/30/21. 4/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, ) |
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT WILLIAMSS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 1) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IF WILLIAMS SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE SHALL, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED DURING THE TIME PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 19, 2020 TO APRIL 19, 2021. ALTERNATIVELY, WILLIAMS CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; IF WILLIAMS IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. HE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE RETURN OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TOWARD THE FEE AND IF WILLIAMS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 4/21/21.4/21/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF. (jaa, ) |
PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, WILLIAMS. (bw, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE/JOHN DOE, ROBERT MCFADDEN, STEVEN MILLER, KYLE RUSSELL, filed by DELANO J. WILLIAMS.(bw, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DELANO J. WILLIAMS..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.