COFFIELD v. MANHIEM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
Plaintiff: LAVAR S. COFFIELD
Defendant: MANHIEM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER JUSTIN DEMBROWSKI and PA STATE PAROLE AGENT JOHN DOE
Case Number: 5:2021cv04517
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M YOUNGE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2021 Filing 7 Status Report on Request for USM 285 Form (JL )
October 26, 2021 DOC # 6 ALONG WITH USM 285 FORM MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, )
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. LAVAR COFFIELD SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. COFFIELD'S CLAIMS AGAINST "MANHEIM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE" ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK SHALL TERMINATE MANHEIM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE A SUMMONSES FOR TROOPER JUSTIN DEMBROWSKI AND SERVICE SHALL BE MADED BY THE U.S. MARSHAL; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 10/25/21.10/25/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH 285 FORM, E-MAILED TO WARDEN OF LCP.(JL )
October 25, 2021 Summons Issued as to JUSTIN DEMBROWSKI. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO U.S. MARSHAL on 10/25/21 (JL )
October 18, 2021 DOC. 5 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LAVAR S. COFFIELD. (bw, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by LAVAR S. COFFIELD..(bw, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JUSTIN DEMBROWSKI, MANHIEM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, PA STATE PAROLE AGENT JOHN DOE, filed by LAVAR S. COFFIELD. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS PREPARED BY PLAINTIFF)(bw, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by LAVAR S. COFFIELD..(bw, )
October 12, 2021 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by LAVAR S. COFFIELD. (bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COFFIELD v. MANHIEM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAVAR S. COFFIELD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MANHIEM PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TROOPER JUSTIN DEMBROWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PA STATE PAROLE AGENT JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?