RALSTON v. CAFFREY et al
Plaintiff: CARL ANDREW RALSTON
Defendant: MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHANE CAFFREY and DAVID PENCHISHEN
Case Number: 5:2021cv04752
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GERALD J PAPPERT
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2021 DOCS. 11 AND 12 AND COMPLAINT PACKET MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, )
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. CARL ANDREW RALSTON, #379223-2765, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE. THE COURT DIRECTS THE WARDEN OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON OR OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL TO ASSESS AN INITIAL FILING FEE AND FORWARD THE INITIAL PAYMENT ASSESSED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER TO THE COURT, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II) FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. RALSTON MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ETC. UPON THE FILING OF A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND RALSTON A BLANK COPY OF THE COURTS FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF RALSTON DOES NOT WISH TO AMEND HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT AND INSTEAD INTENDS TO STAND ON HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT AS ORIGINALLY PLED, HE MAY FILE A NOTICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER STATING THAT INTENT, AT WHICH TIME THE COURT WILL ISSUE A FINAL ORDER DISMISSING THE CASE. ETC. RALSTONS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. #9 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 12/16/21. 12/17/21 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va, )
December 16, 2021 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 12/16/21. 12/17/21 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va, )
December 16, 2021 Warden of Northampton County Prison emailed/faxed copy of #12 Order on 12/17/21. (va, )
December 6, 2021 Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. Envelope. (va, )
December 6, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. Envelope. (va, )
December 6, 2021 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against SHANE CAFFREY, DAVID PENCHISHEN, filed by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. Envelope. (va, )
November 19, 2021 Filing 7 Letter to Clerk dated 11/19/21, re: Copy of Transactions, Medical Records, Disability, Fair Hearing, etc. by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. Envelope. (va, )
November 15, 2021 Filing 6 Prisoner Account Statement by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. Envelope. (va, )
November 15, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. Envelope. (va, )
November 9, 2021 Copy of #4 Order Mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff by Chambers on 11/9/21. (va, )
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF RALSTON SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE SHALL, WITHIN THIRTY (30)DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED DURING THE TIME PERIOD FROM APRIL 25, 2021 THROUGH OCTOBER 25, 2021. ALTERNATIVELY, RALSTON CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/1/21. 11/1/21 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va, )
November 1, 2021 DOC. NO. 3 MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF ON 11/1/2021. (md, )
October 25, 2021 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
October 25, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SHANE CAFFREY, DAVID PENCHISHEN, filed by CARL ANDREW RALSTON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw, )
October 25, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CARL ANDREW RALSTON..(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RALSTON v. CAFFREY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARL ANDREW RALSTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHANE CAFFREY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID PENCHISHEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?