MEYER v. L.C.P. PRIMECARE INC. et al
| DONALD E. MEYER |
| L.C.P. PRIMECARE INC. and ST. LUKES HOSPITAL |
| 5:2021cv05584 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| KAREN S MARSTON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 4 AND A COPY OF THE PRISONER IFP APPLICATION FORM(S) HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, MEYER. (bw, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO COMPLETE THE FORM. IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 (THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A SIGNED, COMPLETE APPLICATION TOPROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 1/3/22.1/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE .(bw, ) Modified on 1/4/2022 (bw, ).
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mas, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against L.C.P. PRIMECARE INC., ST. LUKES HOSPITAL, filed by DONALD E. MEYER. IFP filed. Envelope included. (mas, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DONALD E. MEYER..(mas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
