CARMAN v. THE MORNING CALL, LLC
| JOEY CARMAN |
| THE MORNING CALL, LLC |
| 5:2022cv00744 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JOEY CARMAN As To The Morning Call, LLC(ARAGONA, RENEE) |
| Filing 6 AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2022, it having been reported that the parties have settled the above-captioned action, and pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of ninety (90) days while the parties finalize the written settlement agreement. 4/11/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(sres) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by JOEY CARMAN of Settlement (ARAGONA, RENEE) |
| Document 4 Mailed to Unrep. (er) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE COURT WILL DISMISS THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ON APRIL 22, 2022, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO CARMAN, UNLESS BEFORE THAT DATE CARMAN SEEKS ENTRY OF DEFAULT UNDER RULE 55(A). SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/7/22. 4/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED (NOT MAILED TO UNREP). (er)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE A review of the Court's records shows that a pleading has not been filed in the above-captioned action in response to the complaint as required by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A response was due on or before March 22, 2022. Accordingly, you may file a request with the Clerk for entry of a default in accordance with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to the defendant. If the Request for Default is not filed by April 6, 2022, the Court may enter an order dismissing the case against the above-named defendant for lack of prosecution. (sres) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOEY CARMAN re: Kevin S. Dunn served Summons and Complaint upon THE MORNING CALL, LLC by Personal Service. THE MORNING CALL, LLC served on 3/1/2022, answer due 3/22/2022. (ARAGONA, RENEE) |
| Summons Issued as to THE MORNING CALL, LLC. E-Mailed To: Counsel on 2/28/22 (er) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE MORNING CALL, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15754026.), filed by JOEY CARMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photograph, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Designation Form)(ARAGONA, RENEE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CARMAN v. THE MORNING CALL, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOEY CARMAN | |
| Represented By: | RENEE J. ARAGONA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE MORNING CALL, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
