A.A. et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
A.A. and DANIELLE ROWE |
CITY OF LANCASTER, DETECTIVE AUSTIN KRAUSE, EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP, DETECTIVE RICHARD GAUCK, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, CHIEF COUNTY DETECTIVE KENT SWITZER, OFFICER(S) JOHN DOE(S) and CHIEF OF POLICE JOHN T. BEY |
5:2022cv01621 |
April 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSEPH F LEESON |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by DANIELLE ROWE, A.A.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Letter Confirming Written Consent)(ZELSON, EVA) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Alissa Cardenas Harrison on behalf of EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP with Certificate of Service(Cardenas Harrison, Alissa) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP. EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP waiver sent on 4/29/2022, answer due 6/28/2022. (Carmelite, Donald) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald L. Carmelite on behalf of EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP with Certificate of Service(Carmelite, Donald) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by TRICIA M. AMBROSE on behalf of CHIEF COUNTY DETECTIVE KENT SWITZER, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, RICHARD GAUCK with Certificate of Service(AMBROSE, TRICIA) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by GREGG L. ZEFF on behalf of A.A., DANIELLE ROWE (ZEFF, GREGG) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CITY OF LANCASTER, JOHN T. BEY, AUSTIN KRAUSE. CITY OF LANCASTER waiver sent on 4/27/2022, answer due 6/27/2022; JOHN T. BEY waiver sent on 4/27/2022, answer due 6/27/2022; AUSTIN KRAUSE waiver sent on 4/27/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (MUNION, CHRISTINE) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTINE E. MUNION on behalf of JOHN T. BEY, CITY OF LANCASTER, AUSTIN KRAUSE with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service(MUNION, CHRISTINE) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RICHARD GAUCK. RICHARD GAUCK waiver sent on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CHIEF COUNTY DETECTIVE KENT SWITZER. CHIEF COUNTY DETECTIVE KENT SWITZER waiver sent on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by COUNTY OF LANCASTER. COUNTY OF LANCASTER waiver sent on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID J. MACMAIN on behalf of CHIEF COUNTY DETECTIVE KENT SWITZER, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, RICHARD GAUCK with certificate of service(MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 4 INITIAL PROCEDURAL ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/27/22. 4/28/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by A.A., DANIELLE ROWE. (JL) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JOHN T. BEY, CHIEF COUNTY DETECTIVE KENT SWITZER, CITY OF LANCASTER, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP, RICHARD GAUCK, AUSTIN KRAUSE. Forwarded To: Counsel on 4/27/22. (er) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Derek J. Demeri on behalf of A.A., DANIELLE ROWE. (Demeri, Derek) Modified on 5/2/2022 (md). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15883259.), filed by DANIELLE ROWE, A.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(ZELSON, EVA) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/27/2022) (sbt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/27/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.