GARCIA v. RUSSELL et al
JOSE GARCIA |
KYLE RUSSELL and WALTER OQUENDO |
5:2022cv01821 |
May 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER THAT GARCIAS REQUEST THAT THE COURT "DEDUCT THE AMOUNT NECESSARY" IS DENIED. IF GARCIA SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $5 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER., ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/23/22. 6/23/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO GARCIA.(rf, ) |
Filing 6 Letter by JOSE GARCIA, EXHIBIT, ENVELOPE ATTACHED (rf, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/27/22. 5/31/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO GARCIA. (rf, ) |
PRO SE GUIDELINES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER GARCIA ON 5/16/2022. (md) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (er) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JOSE GARCIA. (er) |
Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, filed by JOSE GARCIA. (IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 BRIEF, #2 EXHIBITS)(er) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by JOSE GARCIA. (er) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.